SNUG Europe 2025
33
Days Left
to Enter

Welcome to the SNUG Europe 2025 Call for Content!
Have you used Synopsys technology to overcome difficult design issues? Increase your visibility and help others in the design community by submitting a presentation for SNUG Europe 2025. SNUG brings together Synopsys users, technologists, and industry experts for this local technical conference devoted to the challenges of electronic design and verification.
Submit your proposal today by creating an account and filling out the submission form. Should you have any questions about submissions, please email snugeurope@synopsys.com.
SNUG Europe 2025 will be hosted at the Hilton Munich Airport on June 2-3, 2025. Make sure to save the date!

We look forward to seeing you!
Your SNUG Europe Team

 

Important Dates

Call for Content Opens | January 8, 2025

Call for Content Closes | February 7, 2025

Preliminary Acceptance Notification | February 21, 2025

Draft Paper Due or Draft Presentation Due | March 14, 2025

Final Paper Due or Full Presentation Due | April 4, 2025

Presentation Slots Awarded | April 11, 2025

Draft Presentation Due (for those doing Papers) | April 30, 2025

Final Presentation Due (for all) | May 26, 2025

SNUG Europe | June 2-3, 2025

 

Acceptance Criteria

1.   Preliminary acceptance is based on the initial submission proposal.

2.   Final acceptance into the conference program agenda will be determined after the first draft of the presentation is complete, reviewed and approved by the Technical Committee.

The SNUG Technical Committee reviews and accepts submissions based on criteria that include:

  • Technical Relevance: Is the topic meaningful to other designers?
  • Technical Applicability: Is the topic general enough to be helpful to other designers?
  • Technical Completeness: Is the topic explored completely? Does it provide enough detail on the approach taken to analyze and address the challenge?
  • Are the problems and solutions well described? Review lessons learned along the way (what was expected/unexpected, what went well/not so well). 
  • Is the conclusion well substantiated? Why is your solution a good one? What can other designers take away and use in their work?
  • What are some ongoing areas of development or next steps which you or a peer could pursue?
  • General Readability: Is the presentation well organized? Is the presentation grammatically correct and spelled correctly?
  • Effective Summary of your effort and results.